David Bowie, RIP

Bowie Changes
Last Sunday, Jan. 10, 2015, David Bowie passed away. I didn’t know it, but he had been battling cancer for 18 or so months. I don’t pay attention to these things, so I don’t know if he was keeping his condition a secret or I just didn’t know.

He was 69.

Like him or hate him, you really have to admit that he was a seminal figure in modern music – an androgynous chameleon who helped shape the showmanship style of music.

I was never a huge fan, but I liked his music. I only owned one LP – the compilation changesonebowie, pictured – but when a song was on the radio, I didn’t click away.

Below are my favorite Bowie songs (that I can recall off the top of my head), in no particular order for the most part.

  • Space Oddity – My favorite Bowie song. Existential angst meets PR (“…and the papers want to know whose shirts you wear…”), it could almost be a parable for what the life of a celebrity is like. Breathtaking and unique at the time. One of my all-time favorite songs.
  • Heroes – Again, larger than life.
  • Changes – The stutter is what makes the song.
  • Fame – Once again, Bowie comments on the celebrity life
  • Ziggy Stardust – One of Bowie’s earliest transformations.

While I do beleive the Bowie was a talented musician and – especially – a solid songwriter, I think he really made his mark by being so far ahead of the curve.

Today, U2 performs in the round with lasers and, I dunno, jetpacks; Madonna/Miley Cyrus keep changing personas to suit their mood/music; ambiguous sexuality today gets a “whatever” shrug. And he was in an interracial marriage for over two decades (to the supermodel Iman), which in the early 1990s wasn’t commonplace.

Back when Bowie was getting started (the changesonebowie album contains music from 1969-1976), bands members were expected to come out on stage with a guitar/bass around their necks, walk up to the microphone and just sing/strum.

Not Bowie – it was not just a performance, it was a production. And you were never quite sure what he’d come out as. A guy with glitter all over his face???

And that – to me – is his legacy.

Overall, Bowie is overall too pop for my taste (Blue Jean, Let’s Dance), but even if he was just a one-hit wonder with Space Oddity, the world would still be richer.

Let’s say goodbye to 2015

2015

I was tempted to begin this with a “well, this was a weird year,” but aren’t they all? How is this year any weirder than any other?

That said, here are some things that stick out to me for this almost expired year:

  • Politics — We’re knee-deep in politics right now with the presidential primaries about a month away. If you thought the 2012 Republican primary season was a mess, well, this year’s follies make the 2012 race look sedate. Donald Trump as the #1 for six months running? I didn’t even think he’d get into the race, much less lead it. And what the heck happened to Jeb! Bush? He was the presumptive nominee with a huge war chest, and he’s in the single digits. I guess he – and so many others – got Trumped. On the Democrat side, Hillary Clinton is getting some heat from a Socialist senator (Bernie Sanders – VT), but is still the most presumptive non-office holder in recent times (presidents running for re-election, or sitting veeps, tend to have clear sailing to the nomination). It’ll be interesting to see how things shake up once people begin casting votes, as opposed to responding to a pollster.
  • Terrorism, International — The rise of ISIS and other, smaller, terror cells were certainly a black spot on this year. One of the more chilling aspects of this is the plight of those caught in the crossfire. Especially in the US – mainly due to politics – humanitarian aid and acceptance of refuges has made a terrible situation even worse. We gots to adjust our moral compass.
  • Terrorism, Domestic — While the politicos love to scare the crap out of voters by capitalizing on the terrorist acts in the US, there have only been about 30 deaths due to terrorism in the US since 9/11. And while even one death is too many, perhaps we should at least be looking at the 30,000+ deaths per year in the US caused by guns. Just look at the math.
  • Vacation — Romy and I hit the Colorado Springs, CO, area this year. Pikes Peak and the Garden of the Gods were highlights, but it was not what I was expecting. I guess I was expecting more craggy peaks and alpine meadows. Not so much. But it was nice to get away from the suburban life, even if for only a few days.
  • Apple Watch — Introduced in September 2014, the watch became widely available this year – yet I have yet to see one in the wild (on an actual person). See a lot of Fitbits – virtually all on people 50+ years old.
  • Technology — Overall, this was a boring tech year. Smartphones are getting to the point where, like desktops, there are only incremental upgrades, not a seismic shift like the first iPhone. The same is true of most technology; nothing is matching the “this changes everything!” excitement of the World Wide Web or mobile technology overall. Some people are betting big on Virtual Reality (VR); isn’t this just 3D TV but using an (awkward) headset? Sure, it may have uses, but how niche will that market be?
  • TV — If you like watching TV, there’s a lot of really good stuff out there, mainly on non-network channels: Netflix, HBO, Amazon…this is an interesting arena. In some ways, the new tracks to get a TV show does change everything. No more three-network tollgates. Toss it up on YouTube, get a deal with Hulu or Showtime or Amazon. We’re really starting to see the disruption to TV that the internet did to newspapers. Oh, and in 2015 more than ever, streaming reigned. No looking to see what time show X is on, it’s on whenever you want to stream it. Side note: Apple, again, failed to nail TV the way it has in so many other areas. It’s perplexing, but I guess that can be chalked up to: TV is hard.
  • Music — Every year when the Grammy nominees/winners are announced, my reaction is “Who are these people?” No different this year. And – in a year sorta dominated by Taylor Swift (yeah, I’ve heard of her) – the year in music, to me, was pretty much meh.
  • Year of Celebrity — I don’t follow the celebrities at all, but it sure seems like the news, Instagrams, Twitters and so on were full of people who are famous for … being famous. Whatever.

I’m sure I missed some things that I should comment on, but this is what I’ve got right now.

New Years Eve
Spirits, New Year’s Eve 2015/2016

Update 1/2/2016: Spirits shared to bring in the new year:

The wine – a Chateauneuf Du Pape, which never disappoints – was good but not *amazing*, which is unusual.

The champagne – a Perrier-Jouet (very dry) – was exceptional.

Had some nice cheeses – including a really biting (in a good way) Bleu cheeese – but we really don’t do the New Year’s Eve celebration like most.

The Ephemeral Society

Littleghost.com
Littleghost.com

Geistlinger.com
Geistlinger.com

I’ve been on the internet for a long time – before the World Wide Web was popular. I first went online in 1992 or 1993, and while Sir Tim Berners-Lee had made public the first web browser in 1991, this was more of an academic tool. Not for your average user.

I had an dial-up account with Delphi because I had read about this internet thing and it sounded interesting. It was all command-line, and – though I didn’t know it at the time – I was doing UNIX commands. It was a very primative space, with a host of strange protocols and functionalities: Gopher, Finger, Archie, Veronica.

Want to download an image? Go to a Gohper or FTP site, download the image, run it through a UUDECODE program, and then direct that output to the appropriate image converter so it will display correctly (JPG, GIF was about all there was at the time). Not exactly as user-friendly as Flickr, that’s for sure!

My Delphi connection? Over a 1200 baud dial-up modem. I quickly upgraded to a 2400 baud modem, and then the format wars intruded. To get a fast (5600 baud), you had to choose between an X2 or Kflex flavor of modem. Some ISPs supported both, some just the one. What a mess…

I mention all this just to show that, as far as connectivity goes, I’ve been through most of it.

And if I had to pick the inflection points – where things really changed online – here are the points I’d pick.

The Web

More than any other development in the arc of the internet’s history, the release and use of a graphic interface to the internet did more to make the internet part of everyday life than any other single development/tool to date. Mosaic, the first popular browser, came out in 1993 and quickly picked up steam (was kind of frustrating to install – what’s a winsock??).

Links, inline pictures, backgrounds and all that HTML had (at the time) to offer just created an explosion of sites, blogs and a truly world-wide web of information.

Think about it – everything we take for granted today probably would not have happened if not for the web: Google, Yahoo!, Amazon, YouTube and so on. Back in the late 1990s and into the 2000s, it was hip to have a web page, especially for your company. Then it morphed into you had to have a company web site, to today, where it’s unthinkable for a company to not have a web presence. It’d be like not having a phone number.

And the web gave rise to a new type of company – the virtual company: Google, Yahoo!, Amazon, Facebook, WordPress and so on. They only exist on the internet (to be fair, Amazon – for whatever reason – just opened a physical book store in Seattle. There may be more to come). Some of these are multi-billion dollar companies, and they only exist in a browser/app.

And these virtual companies are, in some cases, a completely different type of company. Sure, at Amazon you can buy books, just online instead of driving to Borders or Barnes & Noble.

But what about Facebook? Snapchat? Google search? There are no real pre-web equivalents. For Google, maybe the white/yellow pages. For social media (Facebook, Snapchat etc.) there was … the phone call.

Really not the same.

And for some sites – let’s use imdb.com – you could say you could look up Peter O’Toole in an encyclopedia and it’d list some of his movies, but would there be entry for the movies? Especially the less than highly rated ones: sure, possibly Lawrence of Arabia, but would there be an entry for Ratatouille, where O’Toole had a voice part? Doubtful.

And what year was this encyclopedia published? That’s the cut-off for the movies. Encyclopedias are fine for information about the Roman Empire, but a book published in 2010 isn’t going to have info on the Oscar® winners for 2015.

One of the big pluses of the web is that it is easily (though often isn’t) updateable. NOTE: This is also a downside, in some cases, as it allows one to “change one’s mind” and unless there are screen grabs, the new info trumps. When someone writes something stupid in print, it’s forever…

Today, most users don’t even think of the web as HTML and so on. They just go to Google, search and click. It’s become part of the fabric of our daily life.

And that’s not a bad thing.

 

The move to mobile/apps

The first real smartphone (the original iPhone) came out only eight years ago, in 2007. It was a wonder, and – as kind of a surprise to most everyone – it marked the move to apps.

When the iPhone launched, there wasn’t even an App Store (it launched about a year later, with the release of the iPhone 2). Sure, it came preloaded with some apps (time, calendar, mail, text and so on), but the consensus was that people would build HTML sites – optimized for mobile – that would run in the browser. Just like the regular web, just tailored for smaller screens/lower computing power.

Not how it turned out.

As a web – not app – developer, this kind of sucks, but the app approach – for all its limitations (no links!) – makes sense. Compiled programs run faster, can do more stuff than HTML/AJAX/CSS and so on can pull off. And the user experience is better, in many way. For example, instead of firing up Safari (only iPhone browser at launch), pecking out an address to get Google Maps, just click on the Google Maps badge. *BOOM* – you’re in.

With few exceptions, mobile = apps. If you have a smart phone, you might pop open a browser at some point to look something up or load a bookmarked page. But that’s pretty much it, from my experience/observation.

The Ephemeral Society

This is the one that I’ll look back on and say, “huh?”, but I stick with it.

What do I mean by this? Pretty simple: Fewer and fewer people are creating web sites, writing blogs, actually getting into the weeds with the code and plumbing of the internet.

Instead, they are using social media (Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram) to keep in touch with each other. Granted, Instagram, Facebook, Flickr and so on will persist (unlike Snapchat messages). But I used to know a lot of people that owned domains and/or maintained a blog.

Not so much anymore.

By the same token, people who are messing with a web site are either just setting up a Tumblr, a Medium account or are building out on WordPress. None of those options are bad – WordPress keeps picking up share % of active web sites, it’s something ridiculous (25%-50%?). But with any of these solutions, you’re not getting your hands dirty with the code, and that’s getting to be a lost art.

In addition, you’re seceding control to those sites – if Facebook changes its policy in the future to only allow display of X years of posts (doubtful, but possible), well, nothing you can do about it. Medium will move all posts older than a year/bottom 10% of popularity to the archive area, and one has to use the Archive Post to pull up that early/unpopular post. Probably won’t happen, but … again: Nothing you can do about it. Part of the price of free.

Again, not necessarily a bad thing, just a significant switch. Hell, I’m sure there are plenty of folks with a very heavy web presence – that they maintain themselves – that have no idea what CSS is, what a DIV tag can do and so on.

In many ways, it’s a good thing: I built my own gallery tools, to resize, upload and so on. To me, that’s fun.

But the average user has zippo interest in doing what I did, and I respect that. Why not just upload pics drag-and-drop to Flickr? Or shoot on your phone’s camera, post to Facebook right then and there. Thirty seconds and the picture is there…

Again, just different. Yesterday, the web was built out by those who understood it (to a degree); today, anyone can leverage the internet to do things not even possible yesterday.

 

Runners up

  • Javascript (JS): By first shifting much of the interaction off the server and onto the browser, JS allowed web pages to behave more like applications. With the recent popularity of AJAX/JSON, JS now allows calls back to the server but only for small bits of info, making pages even more like an application. No more reload for results.
  • CSS: Separation of markup code from presentation. Hallelujah! Gone are the days of marking each TR or TD with color, font and so on. And god forbid if you want to change that color or font. Global search and replace PITA. With CSS, just change the class. Doink! Done. CSS is still wonky for layout – and that’s still a huge problem. Overall, CSS is a definite plus, a real game-changer.
  • Better browsers: Firefox started the revolution, and now Google’s Chrome is pretty much the best of breed. All browsers are getting faster and rending the increasing amounts of data broadband allows, especially JS-heavy sites.
  • Broadband: Remember dial-up? Trying to forget it? Broadband has two huge advantages over dial-up, regardless of one’s broadbands speed: 1) Way faster than dial-up; 2) Always on. The latter is the “killer app.” If you have to fire up the modem every time you want to see who was the wife in Welcome Back Kotter, well, you’re just not going to do that as often. Always on makes a computer/device an appliance, like glancing at a clock, instead of something you have to always start up, like a fireplace fire. (There is also a third benefit of broadband over dial-up that we tend to forget: Unless one has a dedicated phone line, it’s internet or talking. Phone rings and it can cut you off. Ah, the bad old days…)
  • Improved languages: Beyond the browser display (HTML, JS, CSS), in 2000 there really was only Perl to make dynamic pages. Now, languages such as PHP, Ruby and Python are making front- and back-end programming simpler and faster (development and delivery); in app development, Apple is making a push of its Swift language (builds on/simplifies Objective C), and it’s catching on fast.
  • Death of walled gardens: Think AOL, Prodigy, Compuserve. When I was first on Prodigy, you could only email people on Prodigy. This didn’t last too long in the great scheme of things, but – today – how redonkalous.
  • JQuery: As JS surged in popularity (see first bullet point in this list), it became increasingly difficult to make the JS work the same in all browers (I’m looking at you IE, esp. IE 6). JQuery to the rescue. Make the difficult easy; make the impossible possible.

 

Trick or Treat

Well, it was the “official” Halloween day in our fair suburb, and the weather was pretty crappy.

About 60° (tops) and rainy – never a pelting rain, but, at best, a misting or drizzle.

We still got a fair amount of kids, however.

And tomorrow AM we switch to Standard Time (for all of four months). What a cluster.

What we found in Colorado

Colorado Flag

Great state flag – so contemporary, yet it was pretty much designed back in 1911 (tweak in 1965). See the history of the flag.

Last week – Sept 14th through the 18th – Romy and I were out in the great state of Colorado.

Colorado pic gallery

We flew into Denver – a nice airport, more on that later – and drove the hour or so south to Colorado Springs, out of which where we based our day trips.

Before I get into specifics, some generalities about Colorado Springs and the surrounding areas:

  • Colorado Springs is a perfectly nice city, but it’s kind of a nothingburger. Maybe we missed something, but there was about a block or two of Old West Colorado Springs, and not much else. No real dinner spots and so on. Weird.
  • Again – not judging – but a lot of guys with ZZ Top beards; a lot of (especially younger) women with a lot of ink and various non-natural hair colors. Often worked, but just an observation. Reminded me of Seattle’s denizens. Different than the Chicago ‘burbs I troll around in.
  • With the exception of the spectacular areas we visited, the (roughly south of Denver, on the cusp of the prairie and mountains) part of Colorado we traveled around is pretty…un-pretty. Yes, some rolling hills, but just scrub pines and very little wildlife. I guess that’s the “high desert” environment.
  • We (finally, long story) made it to the top of Pikes Peak (14k ft), but in this part of Colorado, everything starts at about 5-6k feet, so that puts altitudes in perspective. Colo Springs is 6k above sea level. Chicago? About 600 ft…

OK, with that said, here are some more details.

Day 1: Colorado Springs

  • As I mentioned, we flew into Denver – CO Springs has an airport, but way fewer flights – and drove to our hotel in Colorado Springs. The hotel – The Mining Exchange – is a fairly new Wyndham Grand hotel, and they did a nice job of converting an old building to a hotel. Props. (Romy wanted to pack the bathroom – especially the fully tiled shower – into her carry-on and take it home [and for good reason], but can you imagine trying to get that through the TSA?)
  • As I mentioned above, not really much of anything in CO Springs. The old courthouse near our hotel (now a museum) says that this area USED TO be the epicenter of CO Springs, and the new buildings popping up around the area (mainly financial corporations – Well Fargo, Charles Schwabe) indicate that the center is being changed, but – for a visitor – kinda bleh.
  • We had lunch at a nice brew pub – Phantom Canyon Brewing Company. Good (bar) food, great beer. But here’s another sign that Colo Springs is in transition: The city was incorporated in 1886, but this brewery claims to be the oldest in the city: Since 1993! Sure, that’s 22 years, but compared to the age of the city…
  • Overall, in our neck of Colo Springs, very few restaurants, especially considering the a fore mentioned (somewhat large) financial services buildings. Romy guessed that these buildings have cafeterias or food courts; I’d bet she is correct.
  • We wandered around quite a bit our first day in Colo Springs – this was our Colo Springs day; other days were day trips – and it really is an uninspiring city. Much of the city stuff we enjoy – neat architecture, oddball shops, interesting restaurants – just wasn’t there. It wasn’t unpleasant, it was just a “yeah, we’ll never go back there again…”
  • One fun thing – for us flat-landers – is that you can look west on any east/west street…and there are the Rocky Mountain foothills. And just west of those foothills is Pikes Peak, looking like you could reach out and touch it.
  • One unanswered question: Where are the springs?
  • We had dinner at our hotel restaurant (more on that later); we each had a Caesar salad (I added crawfish to mine) because we didn’t want anything heavy. Hit the spot.

 

Day 2: Pikes Peak/Manitou Springs/Seven Falls

Determined to get some good light, we left early for Pikes Peak – only about 20 miles from our hotel. At approximately the halfway point, we pulled into Manitou Springs to find a breakfast joint.

We had a bit of an issue finding a place, but with the smart phone and some other input we came across the Good Karma Coffee Lounge & Deli – which opened at 7am, which is what it was at the time. Score!

So, cue the Ugly Tourist. We can see employees in the joint, but the door is still locked. Well, their number is on the door, so I call them. They say they are open. I say I’m standing outside and the door’s locked… Yes, Ugly Tourist. Like it would have killed me to wait the extra five or so minutes it might have taken them to get around to actually opening. Jeez….

Had a nice breakfast; a cop strolled in at about 7:20am (she probably understood the elastic time out there and would never get there at 7am); she gave us directions to the entrance to Pikes Peak (was sort of fuzzy on maps).

The Colo Springs area – like most areas – is pretty easy to get around in once you get your bearings (which is just about impossible in cities like Boston); however, before that it’s a challenge.

Anyway, Pikes Peak opens at 7:30am; we got our tickets at 7:54am. (The peak is not a National Park, it’s part of Pikes Peak National Forest.)

On thing that floored me when we were planning this trip is that you can drive/take a cog train to the summit – 14,000+ feet. I always (incorrectly) pictured Pikes Peak like the Matterhorn in Europe, a jagged peak whose summit is a square yard of rock accessible only by experienced climbers.

Not a Kia or a Chevy.

Yep, wrong.

The park entrance is about 8k ft; so the 20 mile climb brings one up another 6k – the summit is more than 2.5 miles above sea level. Again, for us flat-landers, that’s something.

We got moving, because we (me) wanted to get to the summit early for the light; can always stop and shoot on the way down. We did stop here and there on the way up, but it way more of a charge to the top.

The road to the peak is well marked and the brochure handed out at the entrance shows the road, the mile markers, approximate altitude and so on. Nicely done.

We got to a series of switch-backs near the peak, and I took one last venture out of the car. Windy as hell. Pretty good view at this point; the sky was blue with clouds for 360° – except right over the peak. This should have been a warning.

We were just coming out of a switch-back, heading toward another (blind) switch-back when a black SUV came around said blind switch-back toward us and was crossing the center line. I told Romy to honk, and when the SUV got closer – and was edging more into our lane – to lay on the horn.

Turned out to be a park ranger (don’t they have flashing lights); he said the summit was closed, as there were 70 to 80mph winds up there. We were hustled out of the park. As we left, the sign at the entrance had changed from just “have enuf gas” etc to “Open to Mile 13 [quite a bit below where we were] High winds above.”

Ah well, we didn’t get to the top, but we had a nice story.

So, we headed east back toward Colo Springs, and we went back to Manitou Springs – the (pretty much a tourist/artsie) town had now woken up. What we found.

Manitou Springs

  • Quirky little town; mostly just a main drag.
  • Kind of what I expected an older town in the foothills of the Rockies to look like. Very subjective.
  • Some interesting buildings – architecturally.
  • Manitou Springs appears to have a spring (how about that?). There is a well/cistern/whatever on the main road. I did NOT (my error) read about the spring(s), but OK, the names start to make sense!
  • Compared to Colo Springs, way more interesting: More authentic, rustic and so on. It was after Labor Day, so I’m sure it wasn’t as active as during the summer, but stuff was not shut down that I could see.
  • We hit a tavern on the main drag – the Royal Tavern. Surprisingly, this is a locals bar. (You’d think it’d be a tourist trap.) Worked for us, but the Yelp reviews declare it a “dive bar.” Yelp is not incorrect. But so what?
  • Since we had locals in the Royal Tavern, we asked for suggestions on what to see (remember, this was Pikes Peak day and we gots blown off the mountain….now what??). Most suggestions were stuff we had expected to do; but our bartender (a local) recommended Seven Falls (which we had heard of).
  • We ended up eating dinner in Manitou Springs, at BooDad’s Louisiana Cafe. Food was…fine. I had blackened catfish – a staple in New Orleans – and it was…fine. Nothing more.

Seven Falls

A little weird. Seven Falls is a box canyon just south of Cheyenne Mountain. It’s cut through the red granite of the region, with some nice formations (the “Three Amigos”). And – as advertised – it ends with a nice seven-tiered waterfall.

Why weird?

  • It’s privately owned. We do a lot of “nature” on our vacations, and it’s weird to pay to see wilderness. No complaint about the cost, which I don’t remember – just odd. We had to pay to go up Pikes Peak, but it’s part of a National Forest. This is, essentially, someone’s private property.
  • Lighting, signage and plantings were almost Disney-like. Pictures I’ve seen show the falls painted in colors at night. Again, Disney. It’s my understanding (from the Royal Tavern barkeep) that Seven Falls has undergone an extensive renovation, and it just opened recently [whatever “recently” means…]), and it kind of feels like that. Fresh plantings and so on. Nicely done, but … not as much nature as expected.

That said, it was a fun experience. Nothing remarkable, but enjoyable.

Your mileage may vary.

We also spend some time in “Old Colorado City,” which is a made-up name: This is the older part of Colorado Springs, about 5-10 miles west of the downtown area in which we stayed (and I’ve whined about above).

Nice area, artsy/touristy, but in less a way than Manitou Springs, and more interesting – to me – architecturally.

And we found a great place for breakfast the next day!

 

Day 3: Garden of the Gods/Pikes Peak Redux

We (meaning me) want to get to Gardens of the Gods early to catch the early morning light. Fortunately, we had found what looked to be a perfect breakfast spot the day before in Old Colorado City: Bon Ton’s. Looked like a place the locales would go, and with a menu a mile long and an opening time of 6am (before sunrise!), it seemed perfect.

And it was about a half-dozen miles from our hotel, at approximately the halfway point between our hotel and the Garden of the Gods.

Bon Ton’s did not disappoint. Good food (I had biscuits and gravy; seemed like the place for same), friendly service, and perfect location for us.

We arrived at Garden of the Gods at approximately 7:30am, and, well, the place is amazing.

What is Garden of the Gods?

Glad you asked!

It’s about 2 square miles of epic stone, sculpted by time, erosion and geological forces. A must-see.

My take on Garden of the Gods:

Garden of the Gods
Garden of the Gods

Gateway Rocks
Gateway Rocks

Balanced Rock
Balenced Rock

  • Like Seven Falls (see above), Garden of the Gods was once privately owned – in this case, by railroad magnate Charles Elliott Perkins. His will left the park to the city of Colorado Springs, with the stipulation that the parcel of land should remain free for all, and that no structures should be built on the land.
  • To date, Perkins’ wishes have been observed. Land around the original park has been purchased, and a Visitor Center – a structure – is across the street from the park.
  • Wild sandstone formations, some soaring, some twisted, all beautiful under the blue skies we were fortunate to experience.
  • Rock climbing is permitted (with a permit); we saw a handful of folks heading for these odd-shaped formations. Probably a rock-climber’s wet dream.
  • It kinda reminded me of the Badlands, with the weird geology. But the Badlands’ formations tended to look almost temporary, like a strange sand sculpture a child would make on a beach. Gardens of the Gods’ formations, on the other hand, looked like they’d last eons. Tall, formidable, unyielding – even the more slender formations.
  • Looking back at the pictures I took there, it appears we spent about three hours at the park – mainly walking on the paths (there are a handful of parking areas). We probably could have done more, but it was a great three or so hours.

We finished up Gardens of the Gods (went to the visitor center) by about noon; and … what now?

Both Romy and I had the same idea – hey, let’s try Pikes Peak again!

We were only 10-12 miles from the base of the peak (everything was pretty close around there), and we failed to get to the peak the previous day, so let’s try it.

We went to the base station (still had to pay the entrance fee – again!), and conditions were clear.

We drove up to the peak with no stops (wanted to make sure we got to top this day!); some pull-offs on the way down.

Pikes Peak Impressions

Pikes Peak
At the peak, 14,110 ft up

Pikes Peak
Logo on cog rail

Pikes Peak
Lot of nothing surrounding the peak…odd

  • No drama here – we made it to the top! Whoo-hoo!
  • As I said earlier, it’s weird to be able to drive to the very top of a 14K ft. mountain.
  • The view from the top was as different as the top of the peak was in my mind – I expected a jagged peak (wrong), ringed by slightliy lower but impressive mountains (wrong again). Pretty much from all sides, Pikes Peak is the sole high point – drops to lower elevations on all sides, with “mountains” in the distance. Kind of odd, to me.
  • We had noticed the temp drop as we went up the peak the previous day – but it was crazy windy. Still, we actually kept track of the temp (on our car’s display) as we climbed to the top on this second try. On a very nice day mid-September at noon, the temp at the entrance (elevation ~8K ft), the temperature was 70°.
  • At the peak: A little windy, and 45°. Quite the swing.
  • Peak (and just below peak) is rock rubble. Mountain is (geologically) dissolving….
  • Cog Rail to the top…interesting
  • There is a certain smell to high-altitude sites, at least to me. Maybe it’s the thinner atmosphere, but it’s there. I smelled that both times I went to Mr. Rainier and when I went (via rail) across the Alps (Switzerland to Italy). Same smell here, and this is a much drier peak. Interesting, as well.
  • After running around on the peak, taking pictures from all angles…I got kind of dizzy, weak in the legs. Nothing tragic, but I could feel the effects of the thin air. Hey, where I live is about 2.5 miles lower than this peak.
  • Both days were were at Pikes Peak, there were a handful of folks bicycling to the peak. Whoa. I guess it’s just for bragging rights, but, still, crazzzy. About three weeks after our trip, they may have reached the top..
  • Glad to have made the top – worth it. But it’s not one of those things you want to do again. It’s really not that scenic, as is the Mt. Rainier area (to me – more mountains, lakes and so on).
  • On the way down – below the tree line – there were nice stands of Quaking Aspens in golden autumn glory mixed in with the pines. Very scenic.

After “reaching bottom” at Pikes Peak, we headed home. Quick stop in Manitou Springs for a beer at The Keg (just your basic bar bar), and then back to our hotel. It was still fairly early, so we took another walk to the El Paso Courthouse (now museum) – it was closed on Monday when we first hit it.

Unfortunately, you can’t tour the whole building (I wanted to get up at least near the copula, but no dice).

It was nice – but more for the architecture for me, and Romy for the exhibits – there was one that interested me, a look back at photography/cameras.

But not a “must see” by any means.

We had dinner at the self-claimed Cajun restaurant in our hotel, Spring Orleans. It was perfectly fine, but nothing at all remarkable. And certainly not Cajun. To be honest, I can’t even recall what I had – looking at the menu I’d bet on the crawfish etouffee, but since I can’t really recall, I guess that sums it up. Very disappointing.

 

Day Four – Royal Gorge & south/southwest of CO Springs

The Royal Gorge Bridge is one of the world’s highest suspension bridges, spanning the Royal Gorge at a height of almost 1,000 ft. Cut by the Arkansas River, the extremely narrow gorge runs for about 10 miles along the river near Canon City, Colorado.

Royal Gorge Ticket

Royal Gorge Tower
Florence Supermax
Florence
Pueblo architecture

Fun facts/impressions:

  • To the best of my reading, this bridge was built as a tourist attraction in 1929, not for any functional need. Weird for a couple of reasons: 1) Sure, impressive…but in 1929 outside of Colorado Springs, who cares?; 2) Why this/here?
  • Very narrow gorge, with the Arkansas River and a train line next to the river at the bottom. The (current) train is for tourists only; can’t speak to any former use – could well have been for tourists only from the get-to.
  • This attraction is kind of weird overall – you drive out in the middle of nowhere, there’s a fairly short bridge over a very deep and narrow canyon and … that’s it. Worth seeing, but not what I expected (was expecting more of something.
  • After Royal Gorge, we headed east toward…we really weren’t quite sure. Aimed at Pueblo. Stopped in Canon City, a nice small town that’s trying to revitalize its downtown, but will it work?? Also – this corner of Colorado (SW) seems to be prison central. There’s a correctional facility at the west end of the main drag – Main Street – of Canon City, and the Florence Supermax (home to the UniBomber, among others). Why? Tax reasons?….
  • We talked with a local in Canyon City, and she was upset about how the downtown was being revitalized (didn’t specify why – which was disappointed, I was hoping for crazy talk….). She mentioned Florence as a town that had done a good job of revitalizing the town. We drove there (on the way to Pueblo), and basically just drove through. No offense, Florence, but not a town worth stopping in…
  • Pueblo- we hit the Riverwalk part of town (seemed to be the old part of town; went into decay; has been restored/improved). Mixed bag – the architecture was great (old buildings restored/repurposed; hell, not flattened!), but the area – even with the Riverwalk, along the Arkansas – appeared rather dead and on the edge of “iffy” parts of town. But I did love the details of the old buildings that remained.

 

Day Five – Red Rock and going home

TnT Breakfast

Friday was our last day in Colorado – we flew out of Denver International Airport. So, we had to check out of our hotel in the morning and see what we could in the little time we had.

We – as planned – ended up heading up to Red Rocks Park & Amphitheatre, in Morrsion, CO, NW of Denver.

We had breakfast at a great little place called the TnT Country Kitchen, just miles from the park. Good eats, and it seemed to be a “locals” place (this was after Labor Day on a Friday; so relatively few tourists).

Two takeaways from this park:

  • Great theater
  • Great geology – lots of rocks, shaped weirdly

Oliver Sacks – A look back

Oliver Sacks

A.R. Luria

Prologue: Oliver Sacks passed away last weekend, Aug. 30, 2015, of a cancer he had seen coming and had made peace with. He was 82 years old.

I honestly don’t know when or how I first stumbled across Oliver Sacks, but my first Sacks’ book was the influential The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat.

That book came out in 1985, and I got the softcover of the book. So maybe I read it in 1990 or so.

Whatever the case, the book was a revelation. A collection of magazine essays (primarily The New Yorker, I believe), each chapter told of a strange case Sacks had come across in his work as a neurologist, some amusing, some baffling, some so surreal as to make one question the veracity of the teller of the tale.

But that was never an issue with Sacks – he had complete fidelity to his subjects. Some detractors have made Sacks out to be a medical tabloid writer, pandering to our perverse interest in the strange. I can see the point, but vehemently disagree.

More than anyone else, the patients themselves are the heroes of Sacks’ stories: Not the author, not other doctors, not the treatments (this may be a little different in Awakenings, which I haven’t read). Each tale is ultimately about how a person/persons dealt with what is a very unusual condition. Sacks was the disinterested – but very much not uninterested – narrator of the tale.

When people ask why they should read Sacks’ books, I usually say something along the lines of, “He does for neurology/how the brain works what Carl Sagan did for the cosmos.”

Which is partly true. Both men helped the layman gain an understanding of each field, but Sagan’s attempt was more to explain things; Sacks’ approach is more to just expose you to the, as of yet, un-understandable.

Both are valid approaches, and both did what they did well.

The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat‘s preface alone is worth picking up a copy in a bookstore and skimming. Deftly written, it also points to another writer who obviously had a huge impact on Sacks: A.R. Luria, a (then) Soviet psychologist.

I became curious about Luria, and I finally stumbled upon a used copy of his book, The Mind of a Mnemonist. The book is subtitled “A Little Book About a Vast Memory,” and it lives up to its billing: It’s about a Russian Luria ran across who had basically unlimited memory.

Luria periodically followed up with the Russian, and the subject could recall vast grids of numbers years later. The Russian’s memory was so good he had to invent tricks to “forget” things. He’d describe it as putting up a room divider or what have you and putting those memories behind the screen to keep the clutter down.

Incredible.

But again, this came from Sacks (who came from Luria…). That’s what good writers invariably accomplish: Get you to read more, in whatever way (author, subject matter, weird poem referenced). This accomplishment isn’t intentional, it’s just an ancillary benefit a good writer unwittingly provides.

It’s sad that there won’t be anymore Sacks books, but we can re-read what we already have (or have yet to read!).

One final note to the Sacks haters: If there is one word I could use to describe Sacks’ writing about the oft-times baffling maladies his patients presented, it would be compassionate. He writes of them proudly and without any fanfare, as if he was a father describing how a child of his own overcame an adversity.

iPad Bork

Had my first iPad (Air, first generation) bork today.

For whatever reason, the Yahoo! weather app kept crashing (my weather app of choice, along with Dark Sky).

I – and this is rare – did the normal Windoze solution: Reboot!

Didn’t work – launching the Yahoo! weather kept crashing upon load.

So…do the other Windoze solution.

Delete.

Reinstall.

This worked.

Not thriled (obviously), but this was the first time this happened.

Previously (years ago), Chrome browser would just flake out on my iPhone (4s); hasn’t happened for years. (NOTE: Due to App Store updates.)

Crossing fingers, yet – at the same time – saying this “bork” is rare on a four or so year old iPad.

Saw(s)

This is going to be one of those entries where many (of the few) will read and roll their eyes, muttering, “What navel-gazing minutiae. Bloggers are losers…”

I think the blogger=loser is true in some cases – but generalizations are always problematic.

This entry, however, is boilerplate blogger blah blah.

I’m just writing because it occurred to me that I just have a crapload of saws.

I’m not a saw collector per se; each has its own function.

Screwdrivers, where you have a blade, phillips or (for some) hex-heads, they are all pretty much the same: Just different sizes of the different heads. Yes, there are some specialty screwdrivers (right-angle and so on).

But saws – with, to be fair, a fair amount of overlap – serve some very different purposes.

Here are the hand saws I own:

  • Crosscut saw – Your basic 24-inch saw for lumber: 2x4s and other standard construction timber. Teeth staggered (to the left, then the right) to make for quicker cuts.
  • Back saw – Use with a miter box to cut construction/trim timber at various angles. Unlike the crosscut, its teeth are inline, to make a cleaner, narrower cut. The “back” refers to a reinforcement on the top of the saw (opposite the teeth) to keep the saw from flexing; again, keeping the cut cleaner.
  • Drywall saw – Looks like a knife with a blade that exhibits large, staggered teeth on the bottom instead of a cutting edge. As the name implies, to quickly cut/cut holes in drywall. Pretty much its only use.
  • Hacksaw – Handle with a horizontal U-bracket. The hacksaw blade – thin, narrow, staggered teeth – attached at the bottom of this U-bracket. Cut various types of metal, usually thinner metals (aluminum downspouts, thin copper tubing). Somewhat bulky in size, but the U-bracket is so items can be cut so the U-bracket (a brace) doesn’t interfere with the material being cut.
  • Hacksaw blade handle – Sorta a specialty item, this is a plastic grip that allows one to attach a hacksaw blade, so it ends up like a knife. Good for tight spaces (ceilings, car engines).
  • Scroll/coping saw – Very much like a hacksaw (handle with U-shaped bracket; blade at bottom) but for wood, and for fine cuts of odd shapes. A very thin blade (height and width) for clean cuts. Electric scroll saws are very popular; I don’t own one.

Here are the electric saws I own:

  • Circular saw – The powered equivalent of the crosscut saw. Mine is one my dad won at a golf tournament decades age; guess what – still works (yes, with updated blade). Can buy a variety of blades for various uses for this saw, the vast majority of work done with a circular saw is cutting construction timber.
  • Jigsaw – The powered equivalent – to some degree – of both the hacksaw (metal) and the scroll saw (wood). Interchangeable blades; up and down cutting action.
  • Reciprocating saw – I have a Milwaukee™ – it’s a tool that thrusts a (changeable) blade horizontally back and forth. Used to cut wood, metal, tile and more. Known generically by the trademarked name Sawz-All® .
  • Table saw – As the name says, a table with a circular saw blade. Move the wood through the blade instead of a circular saw’s blade through wood. To be honest, my table saw is still in a box. Just don’t need it…yet.
  • Drill saw bits – Any number/flavor of bits one can attach to a any drill to “saw” (usually circular holes). I have a hole saw bit with about dozen or so saw blades I can keep/remove to saw – as opposed to drill (bits/speed-bores) – holes. Especially useful for holes for doorknobs and other construction items.

The one thing I’m missing is a chop-saw: Kinda like a circular saw/table saw combo. The saw is mounted on a vertical arm on a cutting platform, and instead of moving the saw through the wood, one pulls the saw arm down and “chops” (get it?) the wood. Variants of this combine mitering and other circular saw functionality in one unit.

I’ll get a good chop saw in the same way I got my reciprocating saw: Needed it.

I needed the Milwaukee to help fix the bathroom; some other chore will require some circular/miter saw more sophisticated than what I currently have.

Whatever. But see how the “stoopid/vacuous” entry about my saws wasn’t totally self-indulgent.

Yes, YMMV (Your mileage may vary….)!

Amazon logistics

Baseball

Long story short – Romy and I were talking on Friday (6/26) about the Ken Burns’ series “Baseball.”

We had watched it; she suggested I buy it….

Later in the evening she looked it up on Amazon, and, yeah, I should purchase it. (Less than $40; but surprised that it was 4:3 [pic format]. It was initially released in 1996…OK…).

OK – I’m an Amazon Prime member (free two-day shipping on most stuff). Whatever.

So, ordered something late Friday, expect it on Tuesday (two biz days).

But when I placed the order late Friday (6/26) (~ 9:45pm), it promised a Sunday (6/28) delivery!

Yikes.

Turned out to be true – ordered the DVD Friday night at approximately 9:45pm; the delivery came on Sunday at about 11:45am.

38 hours. Delivered on Sunday (by USPS). DVD originated from just northwest of Indianapolis. Imagine how much faster it will be when the Amazon Fulfillment Centers in Kenosha, WI (about 50 miles from home, as opposed to Indy shipment, approx. 200 miles away).

Weird new world – I didn’t ask for Sunday delivery (and never expected it), it just came with Prime, I guess.

Just a note about what I’m seeing…

Firefox – stop!

A new version of Firefox appeared today; I installed same.

While I appreciate the security and other fixes, I DO NOT appreciate the install – as part of the base code – of a new part of the browser: Pocket.

Yeah, Pocket sounds interesting, but don’t make it part of a base install of Firefox – make it a trusted add-on, from Mozilla.

Don’t force (non-security) stuff on folks – Again, Pocket sounds interesting. If I really cared, I’d download the add-on.

ALL additions to the browser core can have security issues – more code that can potentially be exploited; it’s the nature of the beast. Don’t make this part of the code base. For security.

ALL additions to the browser core can create overhead that slow things; it’s the nature of the beast. Don’t make this part of the code base. For speed.

Make it an add-on.

And that way, should Pocket become an issue, one can uninstall the add-on, not have to have a new browser with this functionality removed.

That’s the reason I use – for personal use – Chrome on Win64. Just fast, clean, uncluttered.

NOTE: I love Firefox for the way it supports Add-Ons: As a developer, I’d be lost without Firebug & Web Developer; as a person, I’d hate to live without ForecastFox. But don’t put these types of features – like Pocket – in by default, please…

My take. And I “get” Pocket, but won’t (currently) use it.

That’s me.