News.com ran a story today titled Plugging the Linux holes, which discusses how there are some serious problems with missing apps in Linux that make it difficult for some/many users to switch.
The article touched on the big three app gaps: Tax software (Quicken, Intuit), games and Photoshop.
A good cursory overview of what we’ve all read about before; nothing remarkable, really.
However, one sentence caught my eye:
GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program), an open-source graphics program similar to Photoshop, is widely considered to be close to the “good enough” status achieved by OpenOffice and Mozilla.
I just don’t agree with this. There are three issues, to me:
- Photoshop is a killer app. While GIMP has some tools that Photoshop doesn’t have (or are part of the not-yet-integrated ImageReady), such as batching, it’s not Photoshop. And until that Photoshop functionality is there, it’s going to be a tough sell.
- People don’t like learning: This is where OpenOffice has done well – while the interface is a little clunkier than MS Office, it’s similar enough. The GIMP, however, is different enough to scare folks off. This is huge, even though it seems trivial. Mozilla is – again – enough like IE with a slightly different look (but very similar functionality – type in address and page displays) – to not scare the average user.
- I’m not sure about the whole GIMP installation process, but I think PSD support is a plug-in. WTF? What’s a plug-in? Where do I plug it? How do I use it? Translation: Until GIMP supports PSDs [quasi-]natively or the GIMP becomes the de facto standard Photoshop is today, it’s going to get beat up by Photoshop. Really. Not for the average Linux user – who, today, is pretty geeked out – at least. But we (the few, the pimpled, the Geek) are not the real target of the desktop Linux supporters: The non-geeks (in other words, the masses) are desired, as they are the largest group, and they haven’t been convinced yet.
My two cents.